SCHD vs XJUN

SCHD vs XJUN

Which is better, SCHD or XJUN?

Large Cap Value against Option Writing.

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: SCHDHigher Returns: SCHD

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSCHDXJUN
Expense Ratio0.06%Best0.85%
AUM$112.1B$139M
Dividend Yield3.00%0.00%
Holdings10312
YTD Return+24.23%Best+5.25%
1Y Return+27.90%Best+7.46%
3Y Return (annualized)+15.55%Best+10.27%
5Y Return (annualized)+9.97%Best+8.66%
Volatility (annualized)14.8%5.8%Best
Max Drawdown-16.9%-9.1%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$16,083Best$15,148
Fund FamilyCharles Schwab Asset ManagementFirst Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap ValueOption Writing
InceptionOct 20, 2011Jul 12, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 13, 2021 to Sep 17, 2026 (5.2 years).

SCHD vs XJUN growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.2 years both funds cover.

SCHD vs XJUN Performance

Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June (XJUN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year SCHD returned +27.90% while XJUN returned +7.46%. Year to date, SCHD is up 24.23% versus a gain of 5.25% for XJUN.

Over three years, SCHD compounded at +15.55% per year against +10.27% for XJUN; over five years the annualized figures are +9.97% and +8.66% respectively.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.8% compared with 5.8% for XJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.9% for SCHD and -9.1% for XJUN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SCHD charges 0.06% per year while XJUN charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $85 annually, a gap of $79 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.00% against 0.00% for XJUN.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of SCHD and XJUN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

SCHDXJUN

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SCHD or XJUN?

SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while XJUN charges 0.85%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $79 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, SCHD or XJUN?

Over the past year SCHD returned +27.90% vs +7.46% for XJUN, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, SCHD or XJUN?

SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 14.8% annualized versus 5.8% for XJUN. Worst drawdown: SCHD -16.9% vs XJUN -9.1%.

Should I hold both SCHD and XJUN?

SCHD and XJUN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or XJUN?

SCHD yields 3.00% while XJUN yields 0.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XJUN better than SCHD?

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.