VYM vs XJUN
VYM vs XJUN
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF vs FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VYM | XJUN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 0.85% | |
| AUM | $79.0B | $136M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.86% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 568 | 6 | |
| YTD Return | +15.80% | +5.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.12% | +8.83% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.25% | +10.31% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.51% | +8.65% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6% | 5.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -58.8% | -9.1% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2006 | Jul 12, 2021 |
VYM vs XJUN Performance
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June (XJUN) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year VYM returned +26.12% while XJUN returned +8.83%. Year to date, VYM is up 15.80% versus a gain of 5.07% for XJUN.
Over three years, VYM compounded at +18.25% per year against +10.31% for XJUN; over five years the annualized figures are +12.51% and +8.65% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, XJUN has the edge at +8.66% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 5.8% for XJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.8% for VYM and -9.1% for XJUN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VYM charges 0.04% per year while XJUN charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $85 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VYM currently yields 2.86% against 0.00% for XJUN.
Holdings Overlap
VYM and XJUN share 0 holdings out of 559 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VYM or XJUN?
VYM has an expense ratio of 0.04% while XJUN charges 0.85%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $81 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VYM or XJUN?
Over the past year VYM returned +26.12% vs +8.83% for XJUN, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), VYM annualized +7.07% vs +8.66% for XJUN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VYM or XJUN?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 5.8% for XJUN. Worst drawdown: VYM -58.8% vs XJUN -9.1%.
Should I hold both VYM and XJUN?
VYM and XJUN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VYM and XJUN?
VYM and XJUN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 559 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VYM or XJUN?
VYM yields 2.86% while XJUN yields 0.00%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.