QQQA vs VYM
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. QQQA delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 568 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQA | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $68M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.02% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 22 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +46.42% | +16.78% | |
| 1Y Return | +60.45% | +24.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.66% | +18.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.66% | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -38.4% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 18, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
QQQA vs VYM Performance
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQQA returned +60.45% while VYM returned +24.43%. Year to date, QQQA is up 46.42% versus a gain of 16.78% for VYM.
Over three years, QQQA compounded at +28.66% per year against +18.60% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +10.66% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQA has the edge at +11.91% annualized vs +7.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.4% for QQQA and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQA charges 0.58% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $4 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQA currently yields 0.02% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
QQQA and VYM share 6 holdings out of 573 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQA or VYM?
QQQA has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQA or VYM?
Over the past year QQQA returned +60.45% vs +24.43% for VYM, so QQQA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QQQA annualized +11.91% vs +7.11% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQA or VYM?
QQQA has been the more volatile fund at 26.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: QQQA -38.4% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both QQQA and VYM?
QQQA and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQA and VYM?
QQQA and VYM share 6 common holdings with a 2.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 573 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQA or VYM?
QQQA yields 0.02% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.