QQQA vs VOO
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, QQQA or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QQQA led over 1Y and 3Y, VOO over 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQA | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $52M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 21 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +43.09%Best | +13.21% |
| 1Y Return | +55.65%Best | +17.37% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +29.18%Best | +22.66% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.69% | +13.14%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.5% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -38.4% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,879 | $18,539Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 53.5% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 18, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 20, 2021 to Sep 24, 2026 (5.3 years).
QQQA vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.
QQQA vs VOO Performance
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQQA returned +55.65% while VOO returned +17.37%. Year to date, QQQA is up 43.09% versus a gain of 13.21% for VOO.
Over three years, QQQA compounded at +29.18% per year against +22.66% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.69% and +13.14% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.5% compared with 15.4% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.4% for QQQA and -24.5% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQA charges 0.58% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQA currently yields 0.03% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
90.6% of QQQA's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 9.5% of VOO's money is in holdings QQQA also owns.
Most of QQQA is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
19 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in QQQA and 494 in VOO, against full books of 21 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 468 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for QQQA (89.6% of the fund), and 1 for QQQA that do not appear in VOO (4.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQA | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 4.80% | 3.24% | 1.56% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 6.23% | 0.30% | 5.93% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 5.92% | 0.42% | 5.50% |
| DASHDoordash Inc - A | 6.11% | 0.12% | 5.99% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 5.48% | 0.16% | 5.32% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.26% | 1.21% | 3.05% |
| CSXCsx Corp. | 5.16% | 0.15% | 5.01% |
| ROSTRoss Stores, Inc. | 5.18% | 0.13% | 5.05% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 4.60% | 0.71% | 3.89% |
| AXONAxon Enterprise Inc | 5.06% | 0.07% | 4.99% |
90.6% of QQQA is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQA or VOO?
QQQA has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQA or VOO?
Over the past year QQQA returned +55.65% vs +17.37% for VOO, so QQQA leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQA or VOO?
QQQA has been the more volatile fund at 26.5% annualized versus 15.4% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QQQA -38.4% vs VOO -24.5%.
Should I hold both QQQA and VOO?
QQQA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQA and VOO?
90.6% of QQQA's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 9.5% of VOO's is in holdings QQQA also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in QQQA and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQA or VOO?
QQQA yields 0.03% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than QQQA?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QQQA led over 1Y and 3Y, VOO over 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.