QQQA vs VTI
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, QQQA or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QQQA led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQA | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $52M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 21 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +43.09%Best | +13.10% |
| 1Y Return | +55.65%Best | +17.01% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +29.18%Best | +22.26% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.69% | +11.98%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.5% | 15.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -38.4% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,879 | $17,608Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 53.5% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 18, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 20, 2021 to Sep 24, 2026 (5.3 years).
QQQA vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.
QQQA vs VTI Performance
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQQA returned +55.65% while VTI returned +17.01%. Year to date, QQQA is up 43.09% versus a gain of 13.10% for VTI.
Over three years, QQQA compounded at +29.18% per year against +22.26% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.69% and +11.98% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.5% compared with 15.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.4% for QQQA and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQA charges 0.58% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQA currently yields 0.03% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
95.2% of QQQA's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 8.4% of VTI's money is in holdings QQQA also owns.
Most of QQQA is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
20 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in QQQA and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 21 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,130 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for QQQA (89.1% of the fund), and 0 for QQQA that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQA | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 4.80% | 2.90% | 1.90% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 6.23% | 0.26% | 5.97% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 5.92% | 0.38% | 5.54% |
| DASHDoordash Inc - A | 6.11% | 0.10% | 6.01% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 5.48% | 0.14% | 5.34% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.26% | 1.08% | 3.18% |
| ROSTRoss Stores, Inc. | 5.18% | 0.11% | 5.07% |
| CSXCsx Corp. | 5.16% | 0.13% | 5.03% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 4.60% | 0.57% | 4.03% |
| AXONAxon Enterprise Inc | 5.06% | 0.06% | 5.00% |
95.2% of QQQA is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQA or VTI?
QQQA has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQA or VTI?
Over the past year QQQA returned +55.65% vs +17.01% for VTI, so QQQA leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQA or VTI?
QQQA has been the more volatile fund at 26.5% annualized versus 15.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QQQA -38.4% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both QQQA and VTI?
QQQA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQA and VTI?
95.2% of QQQA's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 8.4% of VTI's is in holdings QQQA also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in QQQA and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQA or VTI?
QQQA yields 0.03% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than QQQA?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QQQA led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.