QQQA vs VTI
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QQQA delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQA | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $58M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 22 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +40.31% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +60.27% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.27% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.61% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -38.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 18, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
QQQA vs VTI Performance
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQQA returned +60.27% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, QQQA is up 40.31% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, QQQA compounded at +27.27% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.61% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQA has the edge at +10.96% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.4% for QQQA and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQA charges 0.58% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQA currently yields 0.03% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
QQQA and VTI share 19 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQA or VTI?
QQQA has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQA or VTI?
Over the past year QQQA returned +60.27% vs +22.35% for VTI, so QQQA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QQQA annualized +10.96% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQA or VTI?
QQQA has been the more volatile fund at 26.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QQQA -38.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both QQQA and VTI?
QQQA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQA and VTI?
QQQA and VTI share 19 common holdings with a 9.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQA or VTI?
QQQA yields 0.03% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.