QTJL vs VXUS
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QTJL | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $19M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +8.04% | +15.24% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.71% | +26.32% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.86% | +19.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.91% | +9.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 30, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
QTJL vs VXUS Performance
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QTJL returned +13.71% while VXUS returned +26.32%. Year to date, QTJL is up 8.04% versus a gain of 15.24% for VXUS.
Over three years, QTJL compounded at +18.86% per year against +19.85% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +9.91% and +9.23% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QTJL has the edge at +10.34% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QTJL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for QTJL and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QTJL charges 0.79% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $5 annually, a gap of $74 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QTJL currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QTJL or VXUS?
QTJL has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $74 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QTJL or VXUS?
Over the past year QTJL returned +13.71% vs +26.32% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QTJL annualized +10.34% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QTJL or VXUS?
QTJL has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: QTJL -33.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both QTJL and VXUS?
QTJL and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, QTJL or VXUS?
QTJL yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.