RDTL vs VTI
GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RDTL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $59M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -74.35% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | -76.07% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 121.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -85.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 25, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
RDTL vs VTI Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF (RDTL) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RDTL returned -76.07% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, RDTL is down 74.35% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RDTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 121.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -85.3% for RDTL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RDTL charges 1.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RDTL currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RDTL and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2783 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RDTL | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| RDDT | 66.68% | 0.03% | 66.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RDTL or VTI?
RDTL has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $147 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RDTL or VTI?
Over the past year RDTL returned -76.07% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), RDTL annualized -34.32% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RDTL or VTI?
RDTL has been the more volatile fund at 121.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RDTL -85.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RDTL and VTI?
RDTL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RDTL and VTI?
RDTL and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2783 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RDTL or VTI?
RDTL yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.