REKT vs VTI
Direxion Daily Crypto Industry Bear 1X ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, REKT or VTI?
Opposite sides of the same exposure.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.71, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | REKT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.51% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.99% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.3% | 11.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -54.9% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $7,384 | $12,395Best |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 17, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 160 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. REKT has data through Apr 10, 2026 and VTI through Sep 17, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 17, 2024 to Apr 10, 2026 (1.7 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
REKT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.3% compared with 11.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -54.9% for REKT and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.71. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.
Fees and Cost Over Time
REKT charges 0.51% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $51 vs $3 annually, a gap of $48 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, REKT currently yields 3.99% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 3 holdings in REKT and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 97.8% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 182 days apart, REKT as of Jan 30, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 3 positions we hold weights for in REKT and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 5 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of REKT and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, REKT or VTI?
REKT has an expense ratio of 0.51% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $48 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, REKT or VTI?
REKT has been the more volatile fund at 35.3% annualized versus 11.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: REKT -54.9% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both REKT and VTI?
REKT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.71, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, REKT or VTI?
REKT yields 3.99% while VTI yields 1.03%, so REKT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than REKT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.71, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.