REMX vs VTI
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, REMX or VTI?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. REMX led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | REMX | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.53% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.9B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.00% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 32 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -0.07% | +12.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | +26.18%Best | +19.17% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.97% | +20.86%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -5.94% | +11.72%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 36.0% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -90.2% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $7,362 | $17,404Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 27, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 28, 2010 to Sep 8, 2026 (15.9 years).
REMX vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15.9 years both funds cover.
REMX vs VTI Performance
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year REMX returned +26.18% while VTI returned +19.17%. Year to date, REMX is down 0.07% versus a gain of 12.95% for VTI.
Over three years, REMX compounded at +2.97% per year against +20.86% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -5.94% and +11.72% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.76% annualized vs -4.27%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
REMX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 36.0% compared with 14.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -90.2% for REMX and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
REMX charges 0.53% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $53 vs $3 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, REMX currently yields 2.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 16.8% of REMX's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
REMX and VTI share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in REMX and 2,788 in VTI, against full books of 32 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of REMX and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, REMX or VTI?
REMX has an expense ratio of 0.53% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $50 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, REMX or VTI?
Over the past year REMX returned +26.18% vs +19.17% for VTI, so REMX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), REMX annualized -4.27% vs +12.76% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, REMX or VTI?
REMX has been the more volatile fund at 36.0% annualized versus 14.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: REMX -90.2% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both REMX and VTI?
REMX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between REMX and VTI?
At least 16.8% of REMX's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in REMX and 2,788 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, REMX or VTI?
REMX yields 2.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so REMX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than REMX?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. REMX led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.