REMX vs VOO
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. REMX delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | REMX | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.53% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.1B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.47% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 35 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +2.18% | +13.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +38.95% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +0.95% | +21.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -5.32% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 36.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -90.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 27, 2010 | Sep 7, 2010 |
REMX vs VOO Performance
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year REMX returned +38.95% while VOO returned +23.01%. Year to date, REMX is up 2.18% versus a gain of 13.79% for VOO.
Over three years, REMX compounded at +0.95% per year against +21.78% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -5.32% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs -4.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
REMX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 36.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -90.2% for REMX and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
REMX charges 0.53% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $53 vs $3 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, REMX currently yields 1.47% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
REMX and VOO share 1 holdings out of 531 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in REMX | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALB | 8.48% | 0.02% | 8.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, REMX or VOO?
REMX has an expense ratio of 0.53% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $50 per year of difference.
Which performed better, REMX or VOO?
Over the past year REMX returned +38.95% vs +23.01% for VOO, so REMX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), REMX annualized -4.16% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, REMX or VOO?
REMX has been the more volatile fund at 36.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: REMX -90.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both REMX and VOO?
REMX and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between REMX and VOO?
REMX and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 531 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, REMX or VOO?
REMX yields 1.47% while VOO yields 1.09%, so REMX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.