RESM vs VTI

RESM vs VTI

Which is better, RESM or VTI?

Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. RESM is less concentrated, with 4.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: RESM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRESMVTI
Expense Ratio0.32%0.03%Best
AUM-$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.08%1.03%
Holdings1,0293,543
YTD Return+17.43%Best+11.06%
1Y Return-+15.41%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.48%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.52%
Top 10 Weight4.7%Best33.3%
Fund FamilyColumbia Threadneedle InvestmentsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleSmall Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 11, 2025May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

RESM vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

RESM vs VTI Performance

Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF (RESM) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, RESM is up 17.43% versus a gain of 11.06% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RESM charges 0.32% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $3 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RESM currently yields 0.08% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

RESM already in VTI90.2%
VTI already in RESM1.9%

90.2% of RESM's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.9% of VTI's money is in holdings RESM also owns.

Most of RESM is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

895 positions in common, counted across the 964 positions we hold weights for in RESM and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 1,029 and 3,543.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 964 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for RESM (95.6% of the fund), and 39 for RESM that do not appear in VTI (3.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RESMWeight in VTIDifference
FROGJfrog Ltd0.52%0.01%0.51%
UMBFUmb Financial Corp.0.51%0.01%0.50%
MOG.AMoog Inccommon Stock0.48%0.02%0.46%
GKOSGlaukos Corp.0.48%0.01%0.47%
CTRECaretrust Reit Inc Reit Usd.010.48%0.01%0.47%
VSATViasat Inc0.47%0.01%0.46%
ONBOld National Bancorp/In Common Stock0.45%0.01%0.44%
FCFSFirstcash Inc0.45%0.01%0.44%
IDCCInterdigital Inc0.44%0.01%0.43%
BTSGBrightspring Health0.43%0.01%0.42%

90.2% of RESM is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

RESMVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RESM or VTI?

RESM has an expense ratio of 0.32% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between RESM and VTI?

90.2% of RESM's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.9% of VTI's is in holdings RESM also owns. They hold 895 positions in common, counted across the 964 positions we hold weights for in RESM and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, RESM or VTI?

RESM yields 0.08% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than RESM?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. RESM is less concentrated, with 4.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.