RGTZ vs VYM

RGTZ vs VYM

Which is better, RGTZ or VYM?

Trading-Inverse Debt against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns (1Y): VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRGTZVYM
Expense Ratio1.83%0.04%Best
AUM$7M$83.1B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.22%
Holdings15608
YTD Return-82.71%+10.00%Best
1Y Return-80.16%+13.75%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+18.81%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.63%
Volatility (annualized)168.9%11.2%Best
Fund FamilyDefiance ETFs, LLCVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Inverse DebtLarge Cap Value
InceptionOct 8, 2025Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

RGTZ vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

RGTZ vs VYM Performance

Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF (RGTZ) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RGTZ returned -80.16% while VYM returned +13.75%. Year to date, RGTZ is down 82.71% versus a gain of 10.00% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RGTZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 168.9% compared with 11.2% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.04. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RGTZ charges 1.83% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $183 vs $4 annually, a gap of $179 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RGTZ currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 1 holding in RGTZ and 557 in VYM, totalling 0.7% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, RGTZ as of Sep 15, 2026 and VYM as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in RGTZ and 557 in VYM, against full books of 15 and 608.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of RGTZ and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

RGTZVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RGTZ or VYM?

RGTZ has an expense ratio of 1.83% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $179 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, RGTZ or VYM?

Over the past year RGTZ returned -80.16% vs +13.75% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, RGTZ or VYM?

RGTZ has been the more volatile fund at 168.9% annualized versus 11.2% for VYM.

Should I hold both RGTZ and VYM?

RGTZ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.04, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, RGTZ or VYM?

RGTZ yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than RGTZ?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.