RGYY vs VTI
GraniteShares YieldBoost RGTI ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, RGYY or VTI?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RGYY | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 242.25% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 18 | 3,542 |
| YTD Return | -43.41% | +12.23%Best |
| 1Y Return | -48.75% | +12.74%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.44% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.83% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 13.2%Best |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 25, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
RGYY vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
RGYY vs VTI Performance
GraniteShares YieldBoost RGTI ETF (RGYY) is an ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RGYY returned -48.75% while VTI returned +12.74%. Year to date, RGYY is down 43.41% versus a gain of 12.23% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RGYY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 13.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RGYY charges 1.07% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RGYY currently yields 242.25% against 1.06% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RGYY and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RGYY or VTI?
RGYY has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $104 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RGYY or VTI?
Over the past year RGYY returned -48.75% vs +12.74% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RGYY or VTI?
RGYY has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 13.2% for VTI.
Should I hold both RGYY and VTI?
RGYY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, RGYY or VTI?
RGYY yields 242.25% while VTI yields 1.06%, so RGYY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than RGYY?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.