RILA vs SCHD
Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, RILA or SCHD?
Equity-oriented Balanced against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window. RILA is less concentrated, with 37.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RILA | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $44M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.10% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 171 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +4.71% | +25.88%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.58% | +30.22%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.05% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.17% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5% | 13.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -20.0% | -14.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $12,020 | $13,313Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.0%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | Indexperts | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Equity-oriented Balanced | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2024 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 2, 2025 to Sep 14, 2026 (1.7 years).
RILA vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
RILA vs SCHD Performance
Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF (RILA) is an ETF from Indexperts and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year RILA returned +3.58% while SCHD returned +30.22%. Year to date, RILA is up 4.71% versus a gain of 25.88% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RILA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 13.3% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.0% for RILA and -14.0% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.02. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RILA charges 0.50% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $6 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RILA currently yields 0.10% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
1.4% of RILA's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 4.4% of SCHD's money is in holdings RILA also owns.
SCHD and RILA share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 170 positions we hold weights for in RILA and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 171 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 96 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for RILA (95.5% of the fund), and 163 for RILA that do not appear in SCHD (97.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RILA and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RILA or SCHD?
RILA has an expense ratio of 0.50% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $44 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RILA or SCHD?
Over the past year RILA returned +3.58% vs +30.22% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RILA annualized +11.43% vs +18.33% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RILA or SCHD?
RILA has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 13.3% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: RILA -20.0% vs SCHD -14.0%.
Should I hold both RILA and SCHD?
RILA and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.02, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RILA and SCHD?
4.4% of SCHD's money is in holdings RILA also owns. 4.4% of SCHD's is in holdings RILA also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 170 positions we hold weights for in RILA and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, RILA or SCHD?
RILA yields 0.10% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than RILA?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window. RILA is less concentrated, with 37.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.