RING vs VOO
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RING delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RING | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.3B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.37% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +4.98% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +57.39% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +52.92% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +25.47% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.9% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -80.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 31, 2012 | Sep 7, 2010 |
RING vs VOO Performance
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RING returned +57.39% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, RING is up 4.98% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, RING compounded at +52.92% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +25.47% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs +3.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RING has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.9% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -80.2% for RING and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.21. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RING charges 0.39% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RING currently yields 1.37% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
RING and VOO share 1 holdings out of 545 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RING | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEM | 17.08% | 0.15% | 16.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RING or VOO?
RING has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RING or VOO?
Over the past year RING returned +57.39% vs +22.02% for VOO, so RING leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), RING annualized +3.53% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RING or VOO?
RING has been the more volatile fund at 37.9% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: RING -80.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RING and VOO?
RING and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.21, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RING and VOO?
RING and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 545 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RING or VOO?
RING yields 1.37% while VOO yields 1.08%, so RING currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.