RINK vs VYM
Russell Investments Multisector Bond ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, RINK or VYM?
VYM costs less.
VYM has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RINK | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | - | $95.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.23% |
| Holdings | 571 | 610 |
| YTD Return | -0.02% | +15.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +19.62% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.64% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.48% |
| Fund Family | Russell Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 6, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
RINK vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
RINK vs VYM Performance
Russell Investments Multisector Bond ETF (RINK) is an ETF from Russell Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, RINK is down 0.02% versus a gain of 15.95% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RINK charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RINK currently yields 0.00% against 2.23% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
At least 1.0% of VYM's money is in holdings RINK also owns.
Stated as a floor: for RINK, our book for it covers 39.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VYM and RINK share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 71 days apart, RINK as of Nov 10, 2026 and VYM as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
3 positions in common, counted across the 571 positions we hold weights for in RINK and 602 in VYM, against full books of 571 and 610.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RINK and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RINK or VYM?
RINK has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between RINK and VYM?
At least 1.0% of VYM's money is in holdings RINK also owns. Our book for RINK is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 571 positions we hold weights for in RINK and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, RINK or VYM?
RINK yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.23%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than RINK?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.