IVV vs RINK
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Russell Investments Multisector Bond ETF
Which is better, IVV or RINK?
IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RINK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $879.1B | - |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 509 | 571 |
| YTD Return | +11.33%Best | -0.02% |
| 1Y Return | +13.50% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.45% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.61% | - |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Russell Investments |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | - |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 6, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IVV vs RINK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs RINK Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Russell Investments Multisector Bond ETF (RINK) is an ETF from Russell Investments. Year to date, IVV is up 11.33% versus a loss of 0.02% for RINK.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RINK charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $49 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for RINK.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.3% of IVV's money is in holdings RINK also owns.
Stated as a floor: for RINK, our book for it covers 39.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
2 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 571 in RINK, against full books of 509 and 571.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and RINK you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RINK?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RINK charges 0.49%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RINK?
IVV yields 1.09% while RINK yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RINK better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.