RMCA vs VXUS
RMCA vs VXUS
Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RMCA | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $19M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.72% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 65 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +2.09% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.38% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -6.3% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Rockefeller Capital Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 12, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
RMCA vs VXUS Performance
Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF (RMCA) is a ETF from Rockefeller Capital Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RMCA returned +7.38% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, RMCA is up 2.09% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 5.0% for RMCA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.3% for RMCA and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RMCA charges 0.55% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $5 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RMCA currently yields 4.72% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
RMCA and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7881 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RMCA or VXUS?
RMCA has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $50 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RMCA or VXUS?
Over the past year RMCA returned +7.38% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RMCA annualized +2.08% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RMCA or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 5.0% for RMCA. Worst drawdown: RMCA -6.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both RMCA and VXUS?
RMCA and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RMCA and VXUS?
RMCA and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7881 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RMCA or VXUS?
RMCA yields 4.72% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so RMCA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.