RMIF vs VTI
LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RMIF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.68% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -2.80% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | -1.16% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.47% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -3.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Little Harbor Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 9, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
RMIF vs VTI Performance
LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF (RMIF) is a ETF from Little Harbor Advisors and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RMIF returned -1.16% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, RMIF is down 2.80% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, RMIF compounded at +3.47% per year against +21.27% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +3.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 2.4% for RMIF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.7% for RMIF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RMIF charges 1.55% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $155 vs $3 annually, a gap of $152 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RMIF currently yields 5.68% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RMIF and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RMIF or VTI?
RMIF has an expense ratio of 1.55% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $152 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RMIF or VTI?
Over the past year RMIF returned -1.16% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), RMIF annualized +3.71% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RMIF or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 2.4% for RMIF. Worst drawdown: RMIF -3.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RMIF and VTI?
RMIF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RMIF and VTI?
RMIF and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RMIF or VTI?
RMIF yields 5.68% while VTI yields 1.07%, so RMIF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.