RMOP vs VTI
Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RMOP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $437M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.61% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 271 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +3.93% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.77% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.5% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -6.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Rockefeller Capital Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 12, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
RMOP vs VTI Performance
Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF (RMOP) is a ETF from Rockefeller Capital Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RMOP returned +9.77% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, RMOP is up 3.93% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 5.5% for RMOP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.8% for RMOP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RMOP charges 0.80% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RMOP currently yields 5.61% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RMOP and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2846 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RMOP or VTI?
RMOP has an expense ratio of 0.80% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RMOP or VTI?
Over the past year RMOP returned +9.77% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RMOP annualized +5.14% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RMOP or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 5.5% for RMOP. Worst drawdown: RMOP -6.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RMOP and VTI?
RMOP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RMOP and VTI?
RMOP and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2846 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RMOP or VTI?
RMOP yields 5.61% while VTI yields 1.07%, so RMOP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.