RNMN vs VYM
RiverNorth Market Neutral ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, RNMN or VYM?
Small Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y. RNMN is less concentrated, with 23.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RNMN | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $7M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 9.66% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 177 | 613 |
| YTD Return | -0.04% | +9.40%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +13.45% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.32% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.37% |
| Top 10 Weight | 23.8%Best | 26.1% |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 11, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
RNMN vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
RNMN vs VYM Performance
RiverNorth Market Neutral ETF (RNMN) is an ETF from TrueShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, RNMN is down 0.04% versus a gain of 9.40% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RNMN charges 0.59% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $4 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RNMN currently yields 9.66% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 90 holdings in RNMN and 557 in VYM, totalling 98.0% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 90 positions we hold weights for in RNMN and 557 in VYM, against full books of 177 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 528 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for RNMN (97.1% of the fund), and 57 for RNMN that do not appear in VYM (62.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RNMN and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RNMN or VYM?
RNMN has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, RNMN or VYM?
RNMN yields 9.66% while VYM yields 2.22%, so RNMN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than RNMN?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y. RNMN is less concentrated, with 23.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.