RNMN vs VTI
RiverNorth Market Neutral ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, RNMN or VTI?
Small Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RNMN | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $7M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 9.66% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 177 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -0.03% | +12.34%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +18.37% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.62% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.68% |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 11, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
RNMN vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
RNMN vs VTI Performance
RiverNorth Market Neutral ETF (RNMN) is an ETF from TrueShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, RNMN is down 0.03% versus a gain of 12.34% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RNMN charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RNMN currently yields 9.66% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 87 holdings in RNMN and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 94.1% and 90.6% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 2 positions appear in both.
The two holdings books were reported 123 days apart, RNMN as of Feb 27, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
2 positions in common, counted across the 87 positions we hold weights for in RNMN and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 177 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RNMN and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RNMN or VTI?
RNMN has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, RNMN or VTI?
RNMN yields 9.66% while VTI yields 1.03%, so RNMN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than RNMN?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.