RNRG vs VTI
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RNRG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $26M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.71% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 40 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +2.74% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.53% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.51% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -5.35% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -58.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 27, 2015 | May 24, 2001 |
RNRG vs VTI Performance
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RNRG returned +17.53% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, RNRG is up 2.74% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, RNRG compounded at +3.51% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -5.35% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs -1.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RNRG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.8% for RNRG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RNRG charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RNRG currently yields 1.71% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RNRG or VTI?
RNRG has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RNRG or VTI?
Over the past year RNRG returned +17.53% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), RNRG annualized -1.91% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RNRG or VTI?
RNRG has been the more volatile fund at 19.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RNRG -58.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RNRG and VTI?
RNRG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RNRG and VTI?
RNRG and VTI share 2 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2818 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RNRG or VTI?
RNRG yields 1.71% while VTI yields 1.07%, so RNRG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.