RNRG vs VOO
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RNRG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $26M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.71% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 40 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +2.23% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +16.19% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.34% | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -5.06% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -58.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 27, 2015 | Sep 7, 2010 |
RNRG vs VOO Performance
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RNRG returned +16.19% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, RNRG is up 2.23% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, RNRG compounded at +3.34% per year against +21.79% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -5.06% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.45% annualized vs -1.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RNRG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.7% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.8% for RNRG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RNRG charges 0.65% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RNRG currently yields 1.71% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
RNRG and VOO share 0 holdings out of 538 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RNRG or VOO?
RNRG has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RNRG or VOO?
Over the past year RNRG returned +16.19% vs +20.92% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), RNRG annualized -1.96% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RNRG or VOO?
RNRG has been the more volatile fund at 19.7% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: RNRG -58.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RNRG and VOO?
RNRG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RNRG and VOO?
RNRG and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 538 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RNRG or VOO?
RNRG yields 1.71% while VOO yields 1.08%, so RNRG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.