ROAM vs VTI
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ROAM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ROAM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.44% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $107M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.37% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 327 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +22.78% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.51% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.90% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.71% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -48.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 25, 2015 | May 24, 2001 |
ROAM vs VTI Performance
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) is a ETF from Hartford Funds and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ROAM returned +35.51% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, ROAM is up 22.78% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, ROAM compounded at +22.90% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.71% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +4.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ROAM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.6% for ROAM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ROAM charges 0.44% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $3 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ROAM currently yields 2.37% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ROAM and VTI share 0 holdings out of 3109 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ROAM or VTI?
ROAM has an expense ratio of 0.44% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ROAM or VTI?
Over the past year ROAM returned +35.51% vs +22.39% for VTI, so ROAM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), ROAM annualized +4.94% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ROAM or VTI?
ROAM has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ROAM -48.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ROAM and VTI?
ROAM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ROAM and VTI?
ROAM and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3109 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ROAM or VTI?
ROAM yields 2.37% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ROAM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.