ROBN vs VOO
T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ROBN | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $113M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.03% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -55.51% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | -65.88% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 145.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -87.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 31, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
ROBN vs VOO Performance
T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) is a ETF from REX Shares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ROBN returned -65.88% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, ROBN is down 55.51% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ROBN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 145.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -87.3% for ROBN and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ROBN charges 1.05% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $3 annually, a gap of $102 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ROBN currently yields 8.03% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
ROBN and VOO share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ROBN or VOO?
ROBN has an expense ratio of 1.05% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $102 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ROBN or VOO?
Over the past year ROBN returned -65.88% vs +22.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ROBN annualized +2.78% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ROBN or VOO?
ROBN has been the more volatile fund at 145.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ROBN -87.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ROBN and VOO?
ROBN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ROBN and VOO?
ROBN and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ROBN or VOO?
ROBN yields 8.03% while VOO yields 1.09%, so ROBN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.