RODM vs VTI
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RODM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RODM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.79% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 354 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +14.44% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.25% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.18% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.95% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -38.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 25, 2015 | May 24, 2001 |
RODM vs VTI Performance
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) is a ETF from Hartford Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RODM returned +22.25% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, RODM is up 14.44% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, RODM compounded at +21.18% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.95% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +6.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.7% for RODM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.3% for RODM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RODM charges 0.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RODM currently yields 2.79% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RODM and VTI share 1 holdings out of 3121 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RODM | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SGP:AU | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RODM or VTI?
RODM has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RODM or VTI?
Over the past year RODM returned +22.25% vs +21.39% for VTI, so RODM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), RODM annualized +6.46% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RODM or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.7% for RODM. Worst drawdown: RODM -38.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RODM and VTI?
RODM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RODM and VTI?
RODM and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3121 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RODM or VTI?
RODM yields 2.79% while VTI yields 1.07%, so RODM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.