RODM vs VOO
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RODM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RODM | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.88% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 340 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +14.66% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.99% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.36% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.74% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -38.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 25, 2015 | Sep 7, 2010 |
RODM vs VOO Performance
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) is a ETF from Hartford Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RODM returned +24.99% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, RODM is up 14.66% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, RODM compounded at +20.36% per year against +21.47% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.74% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs +6.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 13.7% for RODM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.3% for RODM and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RODM charges 0.29% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RODM currently yields 2.88% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
RODM and VOO share 0 holdings out of 840 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RODM or VOO?
RODM has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RODM or VOO?
Over the past year RODM returned +24.99% vs +22.62% for VOO, so RODM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), RODM annualized +6.49% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RODM or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 13.7% for RODM. Worst drawdown: RODM -38.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RODM and VOO?
RODM and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RODM and VOO?
RODM and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 840 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RODM or VOO?
RODM yields 2.88% while VOO yields 1.09%, so RODM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.