RVNL vs VXUS
GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RVNL | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.15% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $13M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -51.30% | +14.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.92% | +27.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 76.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -72.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 21, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
RVNL vs VXUS Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF (RVNL) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RVNL returned +2.92% while VXUS returned +27.24%. Year to date, RVNL is down 51.30% versus a gain of 14.07% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RVNL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 76.5% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.9% for RVNL and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.11. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RVNL charges 1.15% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $115 vs $5 annually, a gap of $110 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RVNL currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
RVNL and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RVNL or VXUS?
RVNL has an expense ratio of 1.15% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $110 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RVNL or VXUS?
Over the past year RVNL returned +2.92% vs +27.24% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), RVNL annualized +1.85% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RVNL or VXUS?
RVNL has been the more volatile fund at 76.5% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: RVNL -72.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both RVNL and VXUS?
RVNL and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.11, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RVNL and VXUS?
RVNL and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RVNL or VXUS?
RVNL yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.