RVT vs VOO
Royce Small-Cap Trust Inc vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RVT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RVT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.34% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.7B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.79% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 473 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +21.68% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.04% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.28% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.28% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.8% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -79.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 19, 1986 | Sep 7, 2010 |
RVT vs VOO Performance
Royce Small-Cap Trust Inc (RVT) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RVT returned +30.04% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, RVT is up 21.68% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, RVT compounded at +20.28% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.28% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs +3.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RVT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.8% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.1% for RVT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RVT charges 1.34% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $134 vs $3 annually, a gap of $131 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RVT currently yields 6.79% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
RVT and VOO share 7 holdings out of 969 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RVT or VOO?
RVT has an expense ratio of 1.34% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $131 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RVT or VOO?
Over the past year RVT returned +30.04% vs +22.02% for VOO, so RVT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), RVT annualized +3.05% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RVT or VOO?
RVT has been the more volatile fund at 22.8% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: RVT -79.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RVT and VOO?
RVT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RVT and VOO?
RVT and VOO share 7 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 969 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RVT or VOO?
RVT yields 6.79% while VOO yields 1.09%, so RVT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.