RVT vs VOO
Royce Small-Cap Trust Inc vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, RVT or VOO?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RVT led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. RVT is less concentrated, with 12.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RVT | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.34% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.7B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 6.98% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 473 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +18.72%Best | +13.37% |
| 1Y Return | +24.68%Best | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.93% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.48% | +12.89%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.6% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -53.8% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,023 | $18,335Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 12.4%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 19, 1986 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 4, 2026 (16 years).
RVT vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
RVT vs VOO Performance
Royce Small-Cap Trust Inc (RVT) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RVT returned +24.68% while VOO returned +20.08%. Year to date, RVT is up 18.72% versus a gain of 13.37% for VOO.
Over three years, RVT compounded at +19.93% per year against +21.29% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.48% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.48% annualized vs +6.18%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RVT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.8% for RVT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RVT charges 1.34% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $134 vs $3 annually, a gap of $131 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RVT currently yields 6.98% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
1.1% of RVT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.2% of VOO's money is in holdings RVT also owns.
RVT and VOO share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 424 positions we hold weights for in RVT and 504 in VOO, against full books of 473 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 488 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for RVT (99.1% of the fund), and 378 for RVT that do not appear in VOO (84.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RVT | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TECHBio-Techne Corp | 0.43% | 0.02% | 0.41% |
| TDYTeledyne Technologies Inc | 0.24% | 0.05% | 0.19% |
| RLRalph Lauren Corp. Class A | 0.22% | 0.02% | 0.20% |
| ARESAres Management Corp Preferred Stock 7 | 0.13% | 0.04% | 0.09% |
| CMGComputer Modelling Group | 0.04% | 0.07% | 0.03% |
| FDSFactset Research Systems Inc | 0.09% | 0.01% | 0.08% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RVT and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RVT or VOO?
RVT has an expense ratio of 1.34% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $131 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RVT or VOO?
Over the past year RVT returned +24.68% vs +20.08% for VOO, so RVT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), RVT annualized +6.18% vs +13.48% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RVT or VOO?
RVT has been the more volatile fund at 21.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: RVT -53.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RVT and VOO?
RVT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RVT and VOO?
1.1% of RVT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.2% of VOO's is in holdings RVT also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 424 positions we hold weights for in RVT and 504 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, RVT or VOO?
RVT yields 6.98% while VOO yields 1.08%, so RVT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than RVT?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RVT led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. RVT is less concentrated, with 12.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.