RWJ vs VOO
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, RWJ or VOO?
Small Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RWJ led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. RWJ is less concentrated, with 15.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RWJ | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.1B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.99% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 606 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +23.52%Best | +12.74% |
| 1Y Return | +25.98%Best | +19.43% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.52% | +21.18%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.61% | +12.76%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.8% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -52.4% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,557 | $18,230Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 15.6%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 19, 2008 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 8, 2026 (16 years).
RWJ vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
RWJ vs VOO Performance
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RWJ returned +25.98% while VOO returned +19.43%. Year to date, RWJ is up 23.52% versus a gain of 12.74% for VOO.
Over three years, RWJ compounded at +18.52% per year against +21.18% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.61% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.43% annualized vs +13.25%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RWJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.4% for RWJ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RWJ charges 0.39% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RWJ currently yields 0.99% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
0.2% of RWJ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.1% of VOO's money is in holdings RWJ also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 564 positions we hold weights for in RWJ and 504 in VOO, against full books of 606 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 493 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for RWJ (99.3% of the fund), and 550 for RWJ that do not appear in VOO (96.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RWJ | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNCCentene Corp | 0.21% | 0.05% | 0.16% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RWJ and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RWJ or VOO?
RWJ has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RWJ or VOO?
Over the past year RWJ returned +25.98% vs +19.43% for VOO, so RWJ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), RWJ annualized +13.25% vs +13.43% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RWJ or VOO?
RWJ has been the more volatile fund at 22.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: RWJ -52.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RWJ and VOO?
RWJ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, RWJ or VOO?
RWJ yields 0.99% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than RWJ?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RWJ led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. RWJ is less concentrated, with 15.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.