RWJ vs VTI
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RWJ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RWJ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.1B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.99% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 606 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +24.55% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.10% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.23% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.05% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 19, 2008 | May 24, 2001 |
RWJ vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RWJ returned +34.10% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, RWJ is up 24.55% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, RWJ compounded at +18.23% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.05% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, RWJ has the edge at +11.81% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RWJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.3% for RWJ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RWJ charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RWJ currently yields 0.99% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RWJ and VTI share 456 holdings out of 2917 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RWJ or VTI?
RWJ has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RWJ or VTI?
Over the past year RWJ returned +34.10% vs +21.39% for VTI, so RWJ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), RWJ annualized +11.81% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RWJ or VTI?
RWJ has been the more volatile fund at 24.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RWJ -56.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RWJ and VTI?
RWJ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RWJ and VTI?
RWJ and VTI share 456 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2917 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RWJ or VTI?
RWJ yields 0.99% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.