RXD vs VOO
ProShares UltraShort Health Care vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RXD | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.29% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -19.40% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | -36.96% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -13.94% | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -8.81% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2007 | Sep 7, 2010 |
RXD vs VOO Performance
ProShares UltraShort Health Care (RXD) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RXD returned -36.96% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, RXD is down 19.40% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, RXD compounded at -13.94% per year against +21.79% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -8.81% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.45% annualized vs -24.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RXD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.8% for RXD and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RXD charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RXD currently yields 3.29% against 1.08% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RXD or VOO?
RXD has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RXD or VOO?
Over the past year RXD returned -36.96% vs +20.92% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), RXD annualized -24.96% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RXD or VOO?
RXD has been the more volatile fund at 29.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: RXD -99.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RXD and VOO?
RXD and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, RXD or VOO?
RXD yields 3.29% while VOO yields 1.08%, so RXD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.