RYLG vs VYM
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. RYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RYLG | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $9M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.35% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +16.99% | +14.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.04% | +22.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.35% | +18.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.9% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 4, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
RYLG vs VYM Performance
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RYLG returned +28.04% while VYM returned +22.16%. Year to date, RYLG is up 16.99% versus a gain of 14.66% for VYM.
Over three years, RYLG compounded at +14.35% per year against +18.72% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, RYLG has the edge at +11.27% annualized vs +7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 13.9% for RYLG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for RYLG and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RYLG charges 0.35% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $4 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RYLG currently yields 10.35% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
RYLG and VYM share 0 holdings out of 604 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RYLG or VYM?
RYLG has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RYLG or VYM?
Over the past year RYLG returned +28.04% vs +22.16% for VYM, so RYLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), RYLG annualized +11.27% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RYLG or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 13.9% for RYLG. Worst drawdown: RYLG -22.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both RYLG and VYM?
RYLG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RYLG and VYM?
RYLG and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 604 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RYLG or VYM?
RYLG yields 10.35% while VYM yields 2.24%, so RYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.