RYLG vs VOO
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RYLG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $9M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.35% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +16.99% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.04% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.35% | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 4, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
RYLG vs VOO Performance
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RYLG returned +28.04% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, RYLG is up 16.99% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, RYLG compounded at +14.35% per year against +21.79% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.45% annualized vs +11.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 13.9% for RYLG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for RYLG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RYLG charges 0.35% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RYLG currently yields 10.35% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
RYLG and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RYLG or VOO?
RYLG has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RYLG or VOO?
Over the past year RYLG returned +28.04% vs +20.92% for VOO, so RYLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), RYLG annualized +11.27% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RYLG or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 13.9% for RYLG. Worst drawdown: RYLG -22.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RYLG and VOO?
RYLG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RYLG and VOO?
RYLG and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RYLG or VOO?
RYLG yields 10.35% while VOO yields 1.08%, so RYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.