RYLG vs VXUS
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. RYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RYLG | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $8M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.12% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +17.87% | +15.00% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.22% | +26.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.49% | +19.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 4, 2022 | Jan 26, 2011 |
RYLG vs VXUS Performance
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RYLG returned +28.22% while VXUS returned +26.87%. Year to date, RYLG is up 17.87% versus a gain of 15.00% for VXUS.
Over three years, RYLG compounded at +13.49% per year against +19.79% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, RYLG has the edge at +11.56% annualized vs +4.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.9% for RYLG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for RYLG and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RYLG charges 0.35% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $5 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RYLG currently yields 10.12% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
RYLG and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RYLG or VXUS?
RYLG has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RYLG or VXUS?
Over the past year RYLG returned +28.22% vs +26.87% for VXUS, so RYLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), RYLG annualized +11.56% vs +4.88% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RYLG or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.9% for RYLG. Worst drawdown: RYLG -22.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both RYLG and VXUS?
RYLG and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RYLG and VXUS?
RYLG and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RYLG or VXUS?
RYLG yields 10.12% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so RYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.