RZG vs SCHD
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 Pure Growth ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, RZG or SCHD?
Small Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. RZG led over 3Y, SCHD over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. RZG is less concentrated, with 17.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RZG | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $127M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.46% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 129 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +18.59% | +25.88%Best |
| 1Y Return | +20.32% | +30.22%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.24%Best | +16.05% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.80% | +10.17%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.5% | 13.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -54.4% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,642 | $16,230Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 17.0%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 1, 2006 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 20, 2011 to Sep 14, 2026 (14.9 years).
RZG vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.9 years both funds cover.
RZG vs SCHD Performance
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 Pure Growth ETF (RZG) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year RZG returned +20.32% while SCHD returned +30.22%. Year to date, RZG is up 18.59% versus a gain of 25.88% for SCHD.
Over three years, RZG compounded at +17.24% per year against +16.05% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +4.80% and +10.17% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.41% annualized vs +10.44%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RZG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.5% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -54.4% for RZG and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RZG charges 0.35% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $6 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RZG currently yields 0.46% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
0.4% of RZG's money is in holdings SCHD also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 128 positions we hold weights for in RZG and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 129 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 98 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for RZG (99.9% of the fund), and 122 for RZG that do not appear in SCHD (96.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RZG | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFBCPreferred Bank La | 0.37% | 0.03% | 0.34% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RZG and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RZG or SCHD?
RZG has an expense ratio of 0.35% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RZG or SCHD?
Over the past year RZG returned +20.32% vs +30.22% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), RZG annualized +10.44% vs +11.41% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RZG or SCHD?
RZG has been the more volatile fund at 20.5% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: RZG -54.4% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both RZG and SCHD?
RZG and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, RZG or SCHD?
RZG yields 0.46% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than RZG?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. RZG led over 3Y, SCHD over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. RZG is less concentrated, with 17.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.