RZG vs VXUS
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 Pure Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. RZG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RZG | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $140M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 132 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +27.70% | +15.24% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.65% | +26.32% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.68% | +19.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.09% | +9.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -58.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 1, 2006 | Jan 26, 2011 |
RZG vs VXUS Performance
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 Pure Growth ETF (RZG) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RZG returned +30.65% while VXUS returned +26.32%. Year to date, RZG is up 27.70% versus a gain of 15.24% for VXUS.
Over three years, RZG compounded at +18.68% per year against +19.85% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +6.09% and +9.23% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, RZG has the edge at +8.92% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RZG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.6% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.8% for RZG and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RZG charges 0.35% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $5 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RZG currently yields 0.42% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RZG or VXUS?
RZG has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RZG or VXUS?
Over the past year RZG returned +30.65% vs +26.32% for VXUS, so RZG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), RZG annualized +8.92% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RZG or VXUS?
RZG has been the more volatile fund at 21.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: RZG -58.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both RZG and VXUS?
RZG and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RZG and VXUS?
RZG and VXUS share 2 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7985 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RZG or VXUS?
RZG yields 0.42% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.