RZV vs VXUS
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 Pure Value ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. RZV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RZV | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $308M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.40% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 158 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +26.21% | +13.56% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.91% | +24.30% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.89% | +20.24% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.31% | +9.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -77.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 1, 2006 | Jan 26, 2011 |
RZV vs VXUS Performance
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 Pure Value ETF (RZV) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RZV returned +34.91% while VXUS returned +24.30%. Year to date, RZV is up 26.21% versus a gain of 13.56% for VXUS.
Over three years, RZV compounded at +18.89% per year against +20.24% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +12.31% and +9.37% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, RZV has the edge at +7.38% annualized vs +4.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RZV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.1% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -77.9% for RZV and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RZV charges 0.35% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $5 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RZV currently yields 1.40% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
RZV and VXUS share 3 holdings out of 8022 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RZV or VXUS?
RZV has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RZV or VXUS?
Over the past year RZV returned +34.91% vs +24.30% for VXUS, so RZV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), RZV annualized +7.38% vs +4.79% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RZV or VXUS?
RZV has been the more volatile fund at 29.1% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: RZV -77.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both RZV and VXUS?
RZV and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RZV and VXUS?
RZV and VXUS share 3 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8022 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RZV or VXUS?
RZV yields 1.40% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.