RZV vs VTI
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 Pure Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RZV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RZV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $308M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.40% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 158 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +26.51% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.47% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.16% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.07% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -77.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 1, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
RZV vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 Pure Value ETF (RZV) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RZV returned +35.47% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, RZV is up 26.51% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, RZV compounded at +19.16% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.07% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +7.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RZV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -77.9% for RZV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RZV charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RZV currently yields 1.40% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RZV and VTI share 118 holdings out of 2825 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RZV or VTI?
RZV has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RZV or VTI?
Over the past year RZV returned +35.47% vs +22.35% for VTI, so RZV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), RZV annualized +7.39% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RZV or VTI?
RZV has been the more volatile fund at 29.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RZV -77.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RZV and VTI?
RZV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RZV and VTI?
RZV and VTI share 118 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2825 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RZV or VTI?
RZV yields 1.40% while VTI yields 1.07%, so RZV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.