RZV vs VTI
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 Pure Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, RZV or VTI?
Small Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RZV led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RZV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $297M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.40% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 158 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +23.10%Best | +12.57% |
| 1Y Return | +24.03%Best | +17.22% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.09% | +20.87%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.24% | +11.86%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.1% | 15.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -77.9% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,034 | $17,514Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 1, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 7, 2006 to Sep 11, 2026 (20.5 years).
RZV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 20.5 years both funds cover.
RZV vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 Pure Value ETF (RZV) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RZV returned +24.03% while VTI returned +17.22%. Year to date, RZV is up 23.10% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.
Over three years, RZV compounded at +18.09% per year against +20.87% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.24% and +11.86% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.47% annualized vs +7.22%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RZV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.1% compared with 15.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -77.9% for RZV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RZV charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RZV currently yields 1.40% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 76.5% of RZV's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of RZV is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
119 positions in common, counted across the 157 positions we hold weights for in RZV and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 158 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RZV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MANManpowergroup Inc | 1.94% | 0.00% | 1.94% |
| ACHCAcadia Healthcare Co., Inc. | 1.92% | 0.00% | 1.92% |
| ICHRIchor Holdings Ltd | 1.86% | 0.00% | 1.86% |
| NWLNewell Brands Inc. | 1.61% | 0.00% | 1.61% |
| EPCEdgewell Personal Care Co | 1.57% | 0.00% | 1.57% |
| VSTSVestis Corp | 1.54% | 0.00% | 1.54% |
| CBRLCracker Barrel Old Country Store Inc | 1.40% | 0.00% | 1.40% |
| HZOMarinemax Inc | 1.35% | 0.00% | 1.35% |
| COTYCoty Inc. Class A | 1.31% | 0.00% | 1.31% |
| MLKNHerman Miller Inc | 1.31% | 0.00% | 1.31% |
76.5% of RZV is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RZV or VTI?
RZV has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RZV or VTI?
Over the past year RZV returned +24.03% vs +17.22% for VTI, so RZV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), RZV annualized +7.22% vs +9.47% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RZV or VTI?
RZV has been the more volatile fund at 29.1% annualized versus 15.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RZV -77.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RZV and VTI?
RZV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RZV and VTI?
At least 76.5% of RZV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 119 positions in common, counted across the 157 positions we hold weights for in RZV and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, RZV or VTI?
RZV yields 1.40% while VTI yields 1.03%, so RZV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than RZV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RZV led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.