SAPH vs VTI

SAPH vs VTI

Which is better, SAPH or VTI?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSAPHVTI
Expense Ratio0.19%0.03%Best
AUM$291,396.1$666.9B
Dividend Yield4.09%1.03%
Holdings23,543
YTD Return-5.91%+11.06%Best
1Y Return-10.54%+15.41%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.48%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.52%
Volatility (annualized)31.4%13.2%Best
Max Drawdown-51.7%-19.3%Best
$10,000 over 1.7 years$8,017$12,995Best
Fund FamilyADRHVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJan 3, 2025May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 7, 2025 to Sep 16, 2026 (1.7 years).

SAPH vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.

SAPH vs VTI Performance

SAP SE ADRhedged (SAPH) is an ETF from ADRH and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SAPH returned -10.54% while VTI returned +15.41%. Year to date, SAPH is down 5.91% versus a gain of 11.06% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SAPH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.4% compared with 13.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.7% for SAPH and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.24. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SAPH charges 0.19% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $3 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SAPH currently yields 4.09% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 2 holdings in SAPH and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 99.8% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in SAPH and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 2 and 3,543.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of SAPH and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

SAPHVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SAPH or VTI?

SAPH has an expense ratio of 0.19% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, SAPH or VTI?

Over the past year SAPH returned -10.54% vs +15.41% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), SAPH annualized -12.19% vs +16.66% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, SAPH or VTI?

SAPH has been the more volatile fund at 31.4% annualized versus 13.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SAPH -51.7% vs VTI -19.3%.

Should I hold both SAPH and VTI?

SAPH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.24, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, SAPH or VTI?

SAPH yields 4.09% while VTI yields 1.03%, so SAPH currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than SAPH?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.