SARK vs VTI
Tradr 1X Short Innovation Daily ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SARK | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $44M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.16% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -12.15% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | -16.32% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -31.55% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 47.2% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -81.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Tradr ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 5, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
SARK vs VTI Performance
Tradr 1X Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) is a ETF from Tradr ETFs and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SARK returned -16.32% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, SARK is down 12.15% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, SARK compounded at -31.55% per year against +21.51% for VTI. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs -14.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SARK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 47.2% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -81.1% for SARK and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.75. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SARK charges 1.00% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SARK currently yields 3.16% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SARK or VTI?
SARK has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SARK or VTI?
Over the past year SARK returned -16.32% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), SARK annualized -14.36% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SARK or VTI?
SARK has been the more volatile fund at 47.2% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SARK -81.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SARK and VTI?
SARK and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, SARK or VTI?
SARK yields 3.16% while VTI yields 1.07%, so SARK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.