SARK vs VOO
Tradr 1X Short Innovation Daily ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SARK | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $44M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.16% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -10.19% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | -17.27% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -31.09% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 47.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -81.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Tradr ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 5, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SARK vs VOO Performance
Tradr 1X Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) is a ETF from Tradr ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SARK returned -17.27% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, SARK is down 10.19% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, SARK compounded at -31.09% per year against +21.47% for VOO. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs -13.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SARK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 47.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -81.1% for SARK and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.72. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SARK charges 1.00% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SARK currently yields 3.16% against 1.09% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SARK or VOO?
SARK has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SARK or VOO?
Over the past year SARK returned -17.27% vs +22.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), SARK annualized -13.97% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SARK or VOO?
SARK has been the more volatile fund at 47.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SARK -81.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SARK and VOO?
SARK and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, SARK or VOO?
SARK yields 3.16% while VOO yields 1.09%, so SARK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.