SAWS vs VOO
AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SAWS | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $8M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.02% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 72 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +15.23% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.18% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 30, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SAWS vs VOO Performance
AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) is a ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc. and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SAWS returned +22.18% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, SAWS is up 15.23% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SAWS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.0% for SAWS and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SAWS charges 0.55% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SAWS currently yields 0.02% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SAWS and VOO share 0 holdings out of 576 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SAWS or VOO?
SAWS has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SAWS or VOO?
Over the past year SAWS returned +22.18% vs +22.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), SAWS annualized +13.04% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SAWS or VOO?
SAWS has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SAWS -22.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SAWS and VOO?
SAWS and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SAWS and VOO?
SAWS and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 576 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SAWS or VOO?
SAWS yields 0.02% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.