SAWS vs VOO
AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, SAWS or VOO?
Small Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. SAWS is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SAWS | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $8M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.02% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 75 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +11.09% | +13.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.21% | +20.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.89% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 12.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.0% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $12,368 | $14,356Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 28.8%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 30, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 31, 2024 to Sep 4, 2026 (2.1 years).
SAWS vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
SAWS vs VOO Performance
AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) is an ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc. and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SAWS returned +11.21% while VOO returned +20.08%. Year to date, SAWS is up 11.09% versus a gain of 13.37% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SAWS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 12.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.0% for SAWS and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SAWS charges 0.55% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SAWS currently yields 0.02% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 73 holdings in SAWS and 505 in VOO, totalling 100.0% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 48 days apart, SAWS as of Aug 17, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in SAWS and 505 in VOO, against full books of 75 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 497 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for SAWS (99.5% of the fund), and 71 for SAWS that do not appear in VOO (98.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SAWS and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SAWS or VOO?
SAWS has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SAWS or VOO?
Over the past year SAWS returned +11.21% vs +20.08% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), SAWS annualized +10.65% vs +18.79% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SAWS or VOO?
SAWS has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 12.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SAWS -22.0% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both SAWS and VOO?
SAWS and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SAWS or VOO?
SAWS yields 0.02% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than SAWS?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. SAWS is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.