SCHD vs SIVR
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SIVR delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | SIVR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.30% | |
| AUM | $108.7B | $4.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.13% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 104 | 2 | |
| YTD Return | +26.54% | -10.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.90% | +69.81% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.29% | +41.70% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.65% | +21.74% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6% | 31.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4% | -75.8% | |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Aberdeen | |
| Category | Equity | Commodity | |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Jul 24, 2009 |
SCHD vs SIVR Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) is a ETF from Aberdeen. Over the past year SCHD returned +30.90% while SIVR returned +69.81%. Year to date, SCHD is up 26.54% versus a loss of 10.95% for SIVR.
Over three years, SCHD compounded at +16.29% per year against +41.70% for SIVR; over five years the annualized figures are +9.65% and +21.74% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.51% annualized vs +9.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SIVR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.8% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for SCHD and -75.8% for SIVR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.24. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while SIVR charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $30 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.13% against 0.00% for SIVR.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or SIVR?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while SIVR charges 0.30%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $24 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SCHD or SIVR?
Over the past year SCHD returned +30.90% vs +69.81% for SIVR, so SIVR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), SCHD annualized +11.51% vs +9.10% for SIVR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SCHD or SIVR?
SIVR has been the more volatile fund at 31.8% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: SCHD -33.4% vs SIVR -75.8%.
Should I hold both SCHD and SIVR?
SCHD and SIVR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.24, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or SIVR?
SCHD yields 3.13% while SIVR yields 0.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.