SIVR vs VXUS
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. SIVR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SIVR | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $4.4B | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -6.08% | +14.33% | |
| 1Y Return | +79.44% | +25.32% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +42.67% | +20.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +23.86% | +9.72% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -75.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 24, 2009 | Jan 26, 2011 |
SIVR vs VXUS Performance
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SIVR returned +79.44% while VXUS returned +25.32%. Year to date, SIVR is down 6.08% versus a gain of 14.33% for VXUS.
Over three years, SIVR compounded at +42.67% per year against +20.47% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +23.86% and +9.72% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, SIVR has the edge at +9.43% annualized vs +4.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SIVR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.0% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -75.8% for SIVR and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SIVR charges 0.30% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $5 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SIVR currently yields 0.00% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SIVR or VXUS?
SIVR has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $25 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SIVR or VXUS?
Over the past year SIVR returned +79.44% vs +25.32% for VXUS, so SIVR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), SIVR annualized +9.43% vs +4.84% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SIVR or VXUS?
SIVR has been the more volatile fund at 32.0% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: SIVR -75.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both SIVR and VXUS?
SIVR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, SIVR or VXUS?
SIVR yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.