QQQ vs SIVR
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. SIVR delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SIVR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.30% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $4.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 2 | |
| YTD Return | +15.47% | -5.30% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.44% | +77.88% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.47% | +41.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.22% | +23.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 32.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -75.8% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Aberdeen | |
| Category | Equity | Commodity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jul 24, 2009 |
QQQ vs SIVR Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) is a ETF from Aberdeen. Over the past year QQQ returned +24.44% while SIVR returned +77.88%. Year to date, QQQ is up 15.47% versus a loss of 5.30% for SIVR.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.47% per year against +41.25% for SIVR; over five years the annualized figures are +14.22% and +23.23% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +12.99% annualized vs +9.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SIVR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.0% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -75.8% for SIVR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.26. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SIVR charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $30 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for SIVR.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SIVR?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SIVR charges 0.30%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or SIVR?
Over the past year QQQ returned +24.44% vs +77.88% for SIVR, so SIVR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), QQQ annualized +12.99% vs +9.48% for SIVR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SIVR?
SIVR has been the more volatile fund at 32.0% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs SIVR -75.8%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SIVR?
QQQ and SIVR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.26, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SIVR?
QQQ yields 0.44% while SIVR yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.