QQQ vs SIVR

QQQ vs SIVR

Which is better, QQQ or SIVR?

Large Cap Growth against Silver.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window, SIVR over 3Y and 5Y.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQSIVR
Expense Ratio0.18%Best0.30%
AUM$498.6B$4.3B
Dividend Yield0.42%0.00%
Holdings3212
YTD Return+22.35%Best-18.62%
1Y Return+22.84%Best+20.20%
3Y Return (annualized)+27.55%+38.87%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+16.36%+20.82%Best
Volatility (annualized)17.5%Best31.9%
Max Drawdown-35.1%Best-75.8%
$10,000 over 5 years$21,331$25,745Best
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Aberdeen
CategoryEquityCommodity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthSilver
InceptionMar 10, 1999Jul 24, 2009

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 24, 2009 to Oct 8, 2026 (17.2 years).

QQQ vs SIVR growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 17.2 years both funds cover.

QQQ vs SIVR Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) is an ETF from Aberdeen. Over the past year QQQ returned +22.84% while SIVR returned +20.20%. Year to date, QQQ is up 22.35% versus a loss of 18.62% for SIVR.

Over three years, QQQ compounded at +27.55% per year against +38.87% for SIVR; over five years the annualized figures are +16.36% and +20.82% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +18.95% annualized vs +8.45%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SIVR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.9% compared with 17.5% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for QQQ and -75.8% for SIVR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.26. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SIVR charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $30 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 0.00% for SIVR.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of QQQ and SIVR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

QQQSIVR

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or SIVR?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SIVR charges 0.30%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, QQQ or SIVR?

Over the past year QQQ returned +22.84% vs +20.20% for SIVR, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), QQQ annualized +18.95% vs +8.45% for SIVR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, QQQ or SIVR?

SIVR has been the more volatile fund at 31.9% annualized versus 17.5% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -35.1% vs SIVR -75.8%.

Should I hold both QQQ and SIVR?

QQQ and SIVR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.26, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SIVR?

QQQ yields 0.42% while SIVR yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SIVR better than QQQ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window, SIVR over 3Y and 5Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.