SCHD vs SMRF
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF
Which is better, SCHD or SMRF?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | SMRF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 0.65% |
| AUM | $112.1B | $17M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.00% | 0.61% |
| Holdings | 103 | 73 |
| YTD Return | +23.60%Best | -6.74% |
| 1Y Return | +28.29% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.25% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.25% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.8%Best | 43.5% |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | ALPS Advisors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Feb 18, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
SCHD vs SMRF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SCHD vs SMRF Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF (SMRF) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors. Year to date, SCHD is up 23.60% versus a loss of 6.74% for SMRF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while SMRF charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $65 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.00% against 0.61% for SMRF.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 100 holdings in SCHD and 73 in SMRF, totalling 100.0% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 73 in SMRF, against full books of 103 and 73.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 45 positions for SMRF that do not appear in our book for SCHD (60.7% of the fund), and 99 for SCHD that do not appear in SMRF (99.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SCHD and SMRF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or SMRF?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while SMRF charges 0.65%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $59 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or SMRF?
SCHD yields 3.00% while SMRF yields 0.61%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SMRF better than SCHD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.