SMRF vs VTI

SMRF vs VTI

Which is better, SMRF or VTI?

VTI costs less.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.5%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSMRFVTI
Expense Ratio0.65%0.03%Best
AUM$17M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.61%1.03%
Holdings733,543
YTD Return-9.68%+12.30%Best
1Y Return-+16.08%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.01%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.36%
Top 10 Weight43.5%33.3%Best
Fund FamilyALPS AdvisorsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionFeb 18, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

SMRF vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

SMRF vs VTI Performance

ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF (SMRF) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, SMRF is down 9.68% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SMRF charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SMRF currently yields 0.61% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

SMRF already in VTI58.1%
VTI already in SMRF8.2%

58.1% of SMRF's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 8.2% of VTI's money is in holdings SMRF also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

43 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in SMRF and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 73 and 3,543.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,121 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SMRF (89.2% of the fund), and 3 for SMRF that do not appear in VTI (6.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SMRFWeight in VTIDifference
UECUranium Energy Corp5.41%0.01%5.40%
GEVGe Vernova, Inc.3.60%0.37%3.23%
AVGOBroadcom Inc1.41%2.56%1.15%
EFR:CAEnergy Fuels Inc3.86%0.00%3.86%
OKLOOklo Inc Class A3.70%0.01%3.69%
BWXTBwx Technologies, Inc.3.65%0.02%3.63%
LEUCentrus Energy Corp. Class A3.46%0.00%3.46%
SMRNuscale Power Corp Class A3.31%0.00%3.31%
XEX-Energy Inc Class A3.28%0.00%3.28%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.52%1.29%0.23%

58.1% of SMRF is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

SMRFVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SMRF or VTI?

SMRF has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between SMRF and VTI?

58.1% of SMRF's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 8.2% of VTI's is in holdings SMRF also owns. They hold 43 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in SMRF and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, SMRF or VTI?

SMRF yields 0.61% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than SMRF?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.