SMRF vs VXUS
ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, SMRF or VXUS?
VXUS costs less.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SMRF | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $17M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.61% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 73 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | -6.74% | +14.49%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +21.52% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.55% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.57% |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 18, 2026 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
SMRF vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SMRF vs VXUS Performance
ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF (SMRF) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, SMRF is down 6.74% versus a gain of 14.49% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SMRF charges 0.65% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $5 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SMRF currently yields 0.61% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 31.4% of SMRF's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 88.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
14 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in SMRF and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 73 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SMRF | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1816:SHCgn Power Company Limited | 4.99% | 0.01% | 4.98% |
| NXE:CANexgen Energy Ltd | 4.96% | 0.01% | 4.95% |
| CCO:CACameco Corporation Com Npv | 4.63% | 0.08% | 4.55% |
| PDN:AUPaladin Energy Ltd | 3.91% | 0.01% | 3.90% |
| EFR:CAEnergy Fuels Inc | 3.86% | 0.01% | 3.85% |
| DML:CADenison Mines Corp | 3.25% | 0.01% | 3.24% |
| RR:LNRolls Royce Holdings Plc Common Stock Gbp.2 | 2.47% | 0.38% | 2.09% |
| DYL:AUDeep Yellow Ltd | 1.13% | 0.00% | 1.13% |
| SLX:AUSilex Systems Ltd | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.89% |
| 6082:SHShanghai Biren Technology Co., Ltd. | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.59% |
31.4% of SMRF is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SMRF or VXUS?
SMRF has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $60 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between SMRF and VXUS?
At least 31.4% of SMRF's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in SMRF and 8,082 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, SMRF or VXUS?
SMRF yields 0.61% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than SMRF?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.